On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 27 July 2015 at 11:45, Anders Logg <anders.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I mean it looks very specific and that the number of iterations is likely >> to change if there is an upstream improvement or regression to the >> preconditioner or if the logic of checking the convergence criterion is >> slightly modified. >> >> > The reference number of iterations is computed at the beginning of the > test (it's not hard-wired), so it's robust with respect to all the above > issues. The test failure is showing that (a) the old version of PETSc has a > bug, or (b) that DOLFIN is not interfacing properly to an old version of > PETSc. Neither case is worth fixing. > It is PETSc version 3.4.2 on that buildbot, so yes it is old. Johannes > Garth > > > >> >> mån 27 juli 2015 kl 12:42 skrev Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk>: >> >>> On 27 July 2015 at 11:37, Anders Logg <anders.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, fixing this assertion error in one of the unit tests on one of the >>>> buildbots: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://fenicsproject.org:8010/builders/dolfin-master-full-wheezy-amd64/builds/1707/steps/make%20run_unittests_py/logs/stdio >>>> >>>> num_iter = solver.solve(x, b) >>>> > assert num_iter == num_iter_ref >>>> E assert 27 == 6 >>>> >>>> Looks like a very peculiar test to me. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> What's peculiar about it? >>> >>> The problem is almost certainly an old version of PETSc on the buildbot. >>> The test could be disabled for old versions of PETSc. This might request >>> adding a function that returns the PETSc version. >>> >>> Garth >>> >>>> >>>> mån 27 juli 2015 kl 11:53 skrev Jan Blechta <blec...@karlin.mff.cuni.cz >>>> >: >>>> >>>>> I've got rid of the last forgotten issue targeted to 1.6. Are we >>>>> waiting for something else? >>>>> >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:26:33 +0100 >>>>> "Garth N. Wells" <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > I think we're ready now for the 1.6 release. >>>>> > >>>>> > Garth >>>>> > >>>>> > On 9 July 2015 at 22:54, Cian Wilson <cwil...@ldeo.columbia.edu> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > Done. See: >>>>> > > >>>>> https://bitbucket.org/tferma/dolfin/branch/systemassemblerfix-master >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Cheers, >>>>> > > Cian >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On 07/08/2015 04:03 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On 25 June 2015 at 21:20, Cian Wilson <cwil...@ldeo.columbia.edu> >>>>> > > wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > >> I still have a branch that fixes that and have been actively using >>>>> > >> it since 1.5.0 came out. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Happy to bring it up to current master and take any advice on >>>>> > >> cleaner fixes if that would help. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > > It would be a big help if you could bring your branch up-to-date >>>>> > > with master. Thanks. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Garth >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >> Cheers, >>>>> > >> Cian >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> On 06/25/2015 04:14 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >>> On 25 June 2015 at 19:36, Anders Logg <l...@chalmers.se> wrote: >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>>> What is the status of the upcoming release? Which are the >>>>> current >>>>> > >>>> blockers? >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> This one is a blocker: >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/494 >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> Garth >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> -- >>>>> > >>>> Anders >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> > >>>> fenics mailing list >>>>> > >>>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>> > >>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> > >>> fenics mailing list >>>>> > >>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>> > >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> _______________________________________________ >>>>> > >> fenics mailing list >>>>> > >> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>> > >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>> > >> >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> fenics mailing list >>>>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ > fenics mailing list > fenics@fenicsproject.org > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list fenics@fenicsproject.org http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
