Ok, I can make the release tomorrow if the buildbot is green (I will ignore the error on wheezy-amd64 with the old PETSc version). I'm not sure if I will have enough time to finish the binary packages, because I am continuing my vacation on Wednesday, but I can at least generate the tarballs and update the repositories tomorrow. Let me know if you think I should wait until after my vacation (I will be back in the middle of August).
Johannes On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:00 PM Anders Logg <anders.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > ok, I didn't look closely enough. Just looked at the last piece. > > -- > Anders > > > mån 27 juli 2015 kl 12:58 skrev Johannes Ring <joha...@simula.no>: > >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: >> >>> On 27 July 2015 at 11:45, Anders Logg <anders.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I mean it looks very specific and that the number of iterations is >>>> likely to change if there is an upstream improvement or regression to the >>>> preconditioner or if the logic of checking the convergence criterion is >>>> slightly modified. >>>> >>>> >>> The reference number of iterations is computed at the beginning of >>> the test (it's not hard-wired), so it's robust with respect to all the >>> above issues. The test failure is showing that (a) the old version of PETSc >>> has a bug, or (b) that DOLFIN is not interfacing properly to an old version >>> of PETSc. Neither case is worth fixing. >>> >> >> > It is PETSc version 3.4.2 on that buildbot, so yes it is old. >> >> Johannes >> >> Garth >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> mån 27 juli 2015 kl 12:42 skrev Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk>: >>>> >>>>> On 27 July 2015 at 11:37, Anders Logg <anders.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, fixing this assertion error in one of the unit tests on one of >>>>>> the buildbots: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://fenicsproject.org:8010/builders/dolfin-master-full-wheezy-amd64/builds/1707/steps/make%20run_unittests_py/logs/stdio >>>>>> >>>>>> num_iter = solver.solve(x, b) >>>>>> > assert num_iter == num_iter_ref >>>>>> E assert 27 == 6 >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like a very peculiar test to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> What's peculiar about it? >>>>> >>>>> The problem is almost certainly an old version of PETSc on the >>>>> buildbot. The test could be disabled for old versions of PETSc. This might >>>>> request adding a function that returns the PETSc version. >>>>> >>>>> Garth >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> mån 27 juli 2015 kl 11:53 skrev Jan Blechta < >>>>>> blec...@karlin.mff.cuni.cz>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've got rid of the last forgotten issue targeted to 1.6. Are we >>>>>>> waiting for something else? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:26:33 +0100 >>>>>>> "Garth N. Wells" <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > I think we're ready now for the 1.6 release. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Garth >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On 9 July 2015 at 22:54, Cian Wilson <cwil...@ldeo.columbia.edu> >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Done. See: >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> https://bitbucket.org/tferma/dolfin/branch/systemassemblerfix-master >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > Cheers, >>>>>>> > > Cian >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > On 07/08/2015 04:03 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > On 25 June 2015 at 21:20, Cian Wilson <cwil...@ldeo.columbia.edu >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > wrote: >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > >> I still have a branch that fixes that and have been actively >>>>>>> using >>>>>>> > >> it since 1.5.0 came out. >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> Happy to bring it up to current master and take any advice on >>>>>>> > >> cleaner fixes if that would help. >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > > It would be a big help if you could bring your branch up-to-date >>>>>>> > > with master. Thanks. >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > Garth >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > >> Cheers, >>>>>>> > >> Cian >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> On 06/25/2015 04:14 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >>> On 25 June 2015 at 19:36, Anders Logg <l...@chalmers.se> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> > >>>> What is the status of the upcoming release? Which are the >>>>>>> current >>>>>>> > >>>> blockers? >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> This one is a blocker: >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/494 >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> Garth >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> -- >>>>>>> > >>>> Anders >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> > >>>> fenics mailing list >>>>>>> > >>>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>>>> > >>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> > >>> fenics mailing list >>>>>>> > >>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>>>> > >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> > >> fenics mailing list >>>>>>> > >> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>>>> > >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> fenics mailing list >>>>>>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>>>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> fenics mailing list >>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>> >>
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list fenics@fenicsproject.org http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
