photoscientia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Their fix was ingenious. More a stroke of inspiration than a logical engineering solution. > They fire a reverse pulse of very short duration into the motor at the end of every step. > This acts as electronic damping, and it's very controllable. Maybe Ed could try it? But presumably this would be a firmware level thing, not SCSI level commands. Rob ==================================================================== The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS in the title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if you are reading the Digest.
- RE: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello Rob Geraghty
- RE: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello Hersch Nitikman
- RE: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello Roman Kielich®
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello ILyons
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello photoscientia
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello ILyons
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello Rob Geraghty
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello ILyons
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello Rob Geraghty
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello ILyons
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello Rob Geraghty
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello Rob Geraghty
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello Tony Sleep
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello Rob Geraghty
- Re: LS30 and jaggies was RE:Hello Roman Kielich®