First you'd have to get everybody to agree on what constitutes a "beautiful" woman, something I don't think will ever happen, no matter how many scientists are on the case!



Richard Huggins wrote:
From: Andrew Stiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


...at the rate things are going the beauty of music is unlikely to remain
beyond understanding for more than another 20 years or so.


Oh let's hope not! I mean, would you really want to "understand" the mystery
of a beautiful woman? Wouldn't you rather enjoy being intrigued by it? If
so, doesn't the same sentiment apply to music? I certainly think so. I want
to understand enough to be able to start the process of making it, but I
don't want to miss out on having it surprise me, even as *I* am the one
writing it. And never would I want to be know why a turn of a note, a nuance
of a harmony or the drive of a rhythm moves or excites me. I just want the
end result.


Quote: "There are mysteries too deep and too wonderful to be cheapened by
man's ability to understand them." -- Richard Huggins, 2003 (smile)

--RH

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

.



--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to