On 12 Jun 2005 at 16:09, Eric Dannewitz wrote: > David W. Fenton wrote: > > >If it runs on OS X, why would that be a problem? > > > >I use Word97, myself, even though I could be running Word2K or > >Word2K2, of which I have legal copies. Word97 is sufficient for my > >needs. > > > >If the 3-year-old WordPerfect runs on the most recent versions of OS > >X and has the features you need (and, presumable, stability and > >speed), why would the fact that it's a mere 3 years old be an issue? > > Cause it doesn't run under OS X, it runs under OS 9.
Ah, so the reason you didn't look further was not because it hadn't been updated for 3 years, but because it doesn't run on OS X. Why didn't you say so in the first place? I could have saved myself all that typing! ;) -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
