I got a look at the other edition's violin parts, finally.

First and second violins are written normally for the entire symphony, but there is a part for Violin 3 that has mvt. 1,2 and 4 marked Tacet!

I imagine the idea was to distribute this third violin part to selected members of the firsts and/or seconds to substitute for the mvt. 3 they had in their parts.

I kind of like the other edition's idea (having all three staves on both firsts and seconds) much better, as our conductor did.

BTW, the concert was tonight; it went great!

Christopher



On May 12, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Owain Sutton wrote:

Thought that might be it...for that movement, both the Violin 1 and
Violin 2 parts have a three-staff system showing all parts.  No
specification is given about how to divide it - having a 'rear section'
is common, but I've also played it with normal a3 divisi,


What's a "normal" a3 divisi? That was part of the original question, too. The only answer I have managed to find is, "Whatever the conductor tells you to do."


which produced
a wonderfully-uniform texture, but was more challenging both for
conductor and players.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond Horton
Sent: 12 May 2006 20:14
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] 3 violin parts and rehearsal letters - numbers


This was a thread a couple of months ago.  I believe someone
had a score
with 3 violin parts for a movement or so, and I suggested the
Shostakovitch Fifth as a  precedent. I knew the score was
three distinct
parts for only the third movement, but was not sure how the
violin parts
were handled.

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to