On 14 Oct 2007 at 16:28, Aaron Sherber wrote: > At 03:42 PM 10/14/2007, David W. Fenton wrote: > >The point is that Sibelius is not as versatile as Finale in terms of > >providing options for music entry. Bad-mouthing Finale doesn't change > >the fact that Sibelius is more limiting, and enforces a single way of > >working, whereas Finale offers choice. > > This is also true. Although it's only relevant for those of us who > love Speedy.
But that's a huge majority of the long-term users, no? It's really a huge stumbling block for me -- when I need to use Finale, I mostly need to do it quickly, so I just don't have the time to learn a new entry method that seems to me to be much less efficient. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
