Hi Dave,
Must of had a esp moment as I had just drafted an email to you regarding the glut license field, I will add a 'Restrictive/Distributable' licence field to it sometime today as I also have to add a missing 'BuildDependsOnly: True' field to it as well.
Matt
On Monday, Mar 31, 2003, at 08:43 Australia/Sydney, David R. Morrison wrote:
Here is a list of stable packages missing the MD5, there are many other
validate warnings too though, here are what I consider the 2 most
important of those:
Warning: File name should be automake-1.6.3-1.info (automake-1.6.3-2.info) Warning: No license specified. (glut-3.7-3.info)
[snip]
Matt,
I looked at glut, and I guess there is some ambiguity in the sentence "The programs are not in the public domain, but they are freely distributable without licensing fees."
(Depends on whether it means that people don't have to pay the author a licensing fee, or that distributors are prevented from collecting licensing fees.)
So I guess the license should either be "OSI-Approved", or "Restrictive/Distributable". Which one shall we use?
(This is the only package in the stable tree with no license specified, and I'd like to fix that.)
-- Dave
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
