On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 17:43, David R. Morrison wrote: > I looked at glut, and I guess there is some ambiguity in the sentence > "The programs are not in the > public domain, but they are freely distributable without licensing > fees."
>From /usr/share/doc/libglut3/copyright on my Debian system: Regarding the right to modify and distribute this library: From: Mark Kilgard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#131997: GLUT license Anthony, > Would it be possible for you to just make it absolutely clear that > everyone's allowed to use, copy, and modify (and distribute their > modifications) of libglut? > > Just quoting the above and replying "Yes, that's fine" or similar > would be okay. Yes, that's fine. [If you think Fink is strict with licenses, you've never seen Debian]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
