On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote:
Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package. If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future... Thanks, Jeremy. |
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger Jeremy Higgs
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger David R. Morrison
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger Cian Hughes
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger TheSin
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger Cian Hughes
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger TheSin
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger Jeremy Higgs
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger Cian Hughes
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on T... Jeremy Higgs
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp ... Cian Hughes
- Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp ... Martin Costabel