On 1/16/15 9:11 PM, Scott Hannahs wrote: > >> On Jan 16, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Scott Hannahs <shann...@users.sourceforge.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 19:31, Tomoaki Okayama <okay...@users.sourceforge.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Could anybody fix the broken deb of texlive-texmf please? >>>> As long as it remains broken, all other debs of texlive-related packages >>>> will not be built in the env. >>>> >>>> Tomoaki Okayama >>>> >>>> 2015-01-13 3:49 GMT+09:00 Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 12, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Scott Hannahs >>>>> <shann...@users.sourceforge.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I am getting an error on Mac OS X 10.9 with the TeXLive binary deb file. >>>>> >>>>> Any ideas? >>>>> -Scott >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, it looks like that .deb is broken; 2924k is quite tiny. For 10.10 I >>>>> show >>>>> >>>>> $ ls -l >>>>> /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-texmf_0.20140525-1_darwin-x86%5f64.deb >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 975431474 Jan 6 06:23 >>>>> /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-texmf_0.20140525-1_darwin-x86%5f64.deb >>>>> >>>>> I’m not sure if the .deb is in the middle of being uploaded or a script >>>>> just >>>>> gave up—the binary distribution is built on a different machine than where >>>>> it is hosted. >>>>> >>>>> My best recommendation would be to build it on your own machine via “fink >>>>> —no-use-b install texlive-texmf”. >>>>> -- >>>>> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. >>>>> Fink User Liaison >>> >>> I am still bottom posting… :-) >>> >>> But this might be solved by the install from source exempt that isn't >>> appearing to be working either in Fink! This seems like a big error. This >>> was with a fresh install of fink on Mac OS X 10.10. >>> >>> -Scott >>> >>> >> >> >> The install from source worked for me. What’s the error? > > As I think I posted earlier, I just get the standard “usage” message back > from fink. I tried a couple of combinations. But I am using the flag as a > cut and post from the usage message. Maybe I am doing something stupid. > -Scott > > > > OK, that makes sense, but what is up with fink not recognizing the > no-use-binary option? > > If I run "fink —-no-use-binary-dist install texlive-texmf" I get the standard > fink "usage" message. > > % fink —-no-use-binary-dist install texlive-texmf > Fink 0.38.3 > > Usage: fink [options] command [package...] > fink install pkg1 [pkg2 ...] > > Common commands: > install - install/update the named packages > <deleted> > --no-use-binary-dist - Opposite of use-binary-dist > > This even happens for non existent packages so it seems to be in the option > processing. > > -Scott >
Oh, wrong order. Try "fink install --no-use-binary dist texlive-texmf". -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
