> On Jan 17, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 1/16/15 9:11 PM, Scott Hannahs wrote: >> >>> On Jan 16, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Scott Hannahs >>>> <shann...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 19:31, Tomoaki Okayama <okay...@users.sourceforge.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Could anybody fix the broken deb of texlive-texmf please? >>>>> As long as it remains broken, all other debs of texlive-related packages >>>>> will not be built in the env. >>>>> >>>>> Tomoaki Okayama >>>>> >>>>> 2015-01-13 3:49 GMT+09:00 Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 12, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Scott Hannahs >>>>>> <shann...@users.sourceforge.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am getting an error on Mac OS X 10.9 with the TeXLive binary deb file. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any ideas? >>>>>> -Scott >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, it looks like that .deb is broken; 2924k is quite tiny. For 10.10 >>>>>> I >>>>>> show >>>>>> >>>>>> $ ls -l >>>>>> /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-texmf_0.20140525-1_darwin-x86%5f64.deb >>>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 975431474 Jan 6 06:23 >>>>>> /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-texmf_0.20140525-1_darwin-x86%5f64.deb >>>>>> >>>>>> I’m not sure if the .deb is in the middle of being uploaded or a script >>>>>> just >>>>>> gave up—the binary distribution is built on a different machine than >>>>>> where >>>>>> it is hosted. >>>>>> >>>>>> My best recommendation would be to build it on your own machine via “fink >>>>>> —no-use-b install texlive-texmf”. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. >>>>>> Fink User Liaison >>>> >>>> I am still bottom posting… :-) >>>> >>>> But this might be solved by the install from source exempt that isn't >>>> appearing to be working either in Fink! This seems like a big error. >>>> This was with a fresh install of fink on Mac OS X 10.10. >>>> >>>> -Scott >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> The install from source worked for me. What’s the error? >> >> As I think I posted earlier, I just get the standard “usage” message back >> from fink. I tried a couple of combinations. But I am using the flag as a >> cut and post from the usage message. Maybe I am doing something stupid. >> -Scott >> >> >> >> OK, that makes sense, but what is up with fink not recognizing the >> no-use-binary option? >> >> If I run "fink —-no-use-binary-dist install texlive-texmf" I get the >> standard fink "usage" message. >> >> % fink —-no-use-binary-dist install texlive-texmf >> Fink 0.38.3 >> >> Usage: fink [options] command [package...] >> fink install pkg1 [pkg2 ...] >> >> Common commands: >> install - install/update the named packages >> <deleted> >> --no-use-binary-dist - Opposite of use-binary-dist >> >> This even happens for non existent packages so it seems to be in the option >> processing. >> >> -Scott >> > > Oh, wrong order. Try "fink install --no-use-binary dist texlive-texmf”.
Alexander, as I said, I did try a variety of combinations. With the missing dash included, I get the following error where it thinks that is a package name rather than an option and I went back to the other order. % fink install --no-use-binary-dist texlive-texmf Information about 10184 packages read in 1 seconds. no package found for "--no-use-binary-dist" Failed: no package found for specification '--no-use-binary-dist'! % -Scott ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
