> On Jan 16, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Scott Hannahs <shann...@users.sourceforge.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 19:31, Tomoaki Okayama <okay...@users.sourceforge.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Could anybody fix the broken deb of texlive-texmf please?
>>> As long as it remains broken, all other debs of texlive-related packages
>>> will not be built in the env.
>>>
>>> Tomoaki Okayama
>>>
>>> 2015-01-13 3:49 GMT+09:00 Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 12, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Scott Hannahs
>>>> <shann...@users.sourceforge.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am getting an error on Mac OS X 10.9 with the TeXLive binary deb file.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>> -Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, it looks like that .deb is broken; 2924k is quite tiny. For 10.10 I
>>>> show
>>>>
>>>> $ ls -l
>>>> /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-texmf_0.20140525-1_darwin-x86%5f64.deb
>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 975431474 Jan 6 06:23
>>>> /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-texmf_0.20140525-1_darwin-x86%5f64.deb
>>>>
>>>> I’m not sure if the .deb is in the middle of being uploaded or a script
>>>> just
>>>> gave up—the binary distribution is built on a different machine than where
>>>> it is hosted.
>>>>
>>>> My best recommendation would be to build it on your own machine via “fink
>>>> —no-use-b install texlive-texmf”.
>>>> --
>>>> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
>>>> Fink User Liaison
>>
>> I am still bottom posting… :-)
>>
>> But this might be solved by the install from source exempt that isn't
>> appearing to be working either in Fink! This seems like a big error. This
>> was with a fresh install of fink on Mac OS X 10.10.
>>
>> -Scott
>>
>>
>
>
> The install from source worked for me. What’s the error?
As I think I posted earlier, I just get the standard “usage” message back from
fink. I tried a couple of combinations. But I am using the flag as a cut and
post from the usage message. Maybe I am doing something stupid.
-Scott
OK, that makes sense, but what is up with fink not recognizing the
no-use-binary option?
If I run "fink —-no-use-binary-dist install texlive-texmf" I get the standard
fink "usage" message.
% fink —-no-use-binary-dist install texlive-texmf
Fink 0.38.3
Usage: fink [options] command [package...]
fink install pkg1 [pkg2 ...]
Common commands:
install - install/update the named packages
<deleted>
--no-use-binary-dist - Opposite of use-binary-dist
This even happens for non existent packages so it seems to be in the option
processing.
-Scott
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
