Sean wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007 2:19 AM, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sean wrote:
>> []
>>> nm -m /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so|fgrep _osx_about
>>>
>>> with the following result:
>>>
>>> 00001090 (__TEXT,__text) non-external _osx_about
>> Are you sure this is the *same* libOSX.so that gave you earlier the
>> error message
>>
>>> dlopen(/sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so, 2): Symbol not found: _osx_about
>>>   Referenced from: /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so
>>>   Expected in: flat namespace
>>>
>> The first message says that the symbol is defined, but private, and the
>> second says that the symbol is undefined. It is hard to believe that
>> this comes from the same binary.
>>
>> --
>> Martin
>>
>>
> 
> I'm pretty sure that they're not - I've recompiled and reinstall
> several times since the original email. So, I redid both tests, and
> they are indeed the same error messages from the same
> /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so .
> 
> If there are any other tests you'd like me to run, just let me know.
> 
> Sean


While these messages may not have been from the same binary, they can be 
generated from the same binary as I get the identical output 
(leopard/intel/MBP after today's updates):

bash-3.2$ xmms
dlopen(/sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so, 2): Symbol not found: _osx_about
   Referenced from: /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so
   Expected in: flat namespace

bash-3.2$ nm -m /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so|fgrep _osx_about
00001090 (__TEXT,__text) non-external _osx_about

(these commands were run without any intervening processes--like 
rebuilding, for instance)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to