On 2/25/19 4:45 PM, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 25-2-2019 13:51, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 2/24/19 10:52 AM, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
The security database inside the distribution is already initialized with a Legacy_Auth SYSDBA only. I'm not sure why the same can't be done for SRP (or at least: isn't done for SRP).


First half of an answer is very simple - in order to avoid network server running with SYSDBA/masterkey login in default configuration. Looking at this discussion I once again notice that this protection is rather efficient :)

Then lets change this question to why the security database in the distribution isn't initialized for SRP (ie having the PLG$SRP table, maybe other things needed). Would it be possible to initialize it as part of the distribution **without** having a user present? That at least would avoid the "Look at the compatibility chapter" error.

It will be very useful for a user which started to change configuration file not understanding it to read an instruction instead of continuing in random order. Once again - if one includes SRP in configuration security DB should contain at least one SRP user, if there are no users why include it at all?


And given the default security database does contain a legacy auth with SYSDBA/masterke it is insecure anyway for people who'll enable Legacy_Auth.


If anyone himself changed configuration to include legacy plugin he definitely gets insecure configuration. Certainly I talk about default configuration which was already mentioned explicitly.




Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to