On May 7, 4:09 pm, sir_brizz <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm am COMPLETELY baffled about why so much effort is going into all
> these complex activation schemes when it seems like the easiest to
> develop and easiest to use functionality is already self evident.
>
> One option "On by default with domain blacklist" or "Off by default
> with domain whitelist".
We dropped that as too complex.
>
> Then you either have Firebug always on (for those of us that just
> prefer to have it on by default on every page we visit) and a way to
> disable each piece of functionality per domain, or you have Firebug
> always off (for those that prefer the performance benefits) and a way
> to enable each piece of functionality per domain.
Also dropped too complex.
>
> Where did all this click, click, click to enable, disable, blabbity
> blabbity blabbity come from? 1.4 is completely confusing and
> incomprehensible right now. Previous versions of Firebug were very
> simple and minimalistic, they didn't require a bunch of knowledge
> about how the extension operated just to use it in a worthwhile way.
I don't know what you are referring to. If you can list the steps that
you find difficult then may be I can comment.
One problem with the discussion thread here is that it is a mix of bug
reports and learning how to explain the 1.4 mechanism. I believe the
final result will be simple enough.
jjb
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
