On Jul 3, 10:19 am, sir_brizz <[email protected]> wrote:
...
> Well, I guess that is part of my confusion about 1.4. It seems an
> extraordinary amount of time was spent on something that is hugely
> complex and doesn't even really contribute to the core functionality
> of Firebug. That's why I would have thought a more simple and flexible
> system would have been adopted moving on from 1.3.
Yes, I invested a huge amount of time: to get rid of the garbage that
was 1.3. I don't know where you get the idea that 1.4 activation is
hugely complex. It's less than 150 lines of code:
http://code.google.com/p/fbug/source/browse/branches/firebug1.4/content/firebug/firebug.js#3374
...
> > Yes we could have On For All Pages obey the black list settings. But
> > I'm not sure that would be less confusing.
>
> I don't really want that. I'd rather just have "If Firebug is not
> showing and you go to another page, continue not showing Firebug". It
So use "Off for all pages".
> doesn't make sense to have it popping up and minimizing all over the
> place. Currently there is no way to BOTH minimize and close Firebug
> for a page when "On for all pages" is checked, therefore if I want
> firebug to stay minimized and turn it off for a page, I can't.
? That combo would not make sense. Closed is "not active and not
showing". Minimized is "active and not showing". You can't have both.
jjb
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
