> I agree, and I have already started my own collection of useful-to-me > fish scripts which I sync across machines. I am not dismissing fish's > abbreviations, functions, or custom scripts at all. This particular > example is just a case where Bash has the advantage.
Something that might be nice in this case is an alias to easily run a single bash command. That way you don't have to choose between fish or bash. Not sure how that would work though, and if there is some way to create an alias that receives its arguments verbatim, i.e., without glob expansion and parameter substitution, so that you don't have to quote the command like `sh -c 'rm [b-k]*'`. _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
