Ok, I might be wrong about the "smothness", I just don't seen any difference, but that can be subjective. However, using a higher frame rate does put more burden on the rendering routines, so if you already have a problem with frames being dropped, it will only get worse by incrementing de FPS.
Cheers Juan Pablo Califano 2008/5/7, Steven Sacks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Juan Pablo Califano wrote: > > > By the way, in most cases setting a FPS above 30 doesn't make much sense > > (bear in mind that a NTSC video signal runs at 30 FPS, and a PAL one at > > 25 > > FPS). And it will only worsen frame-dropping problem, if you already > > have > > one. > > > > > > I'm awfully tired of hearing this argument put forth by people. If this > had even a remote possibility of truth then Nvidia and ATI would be out of > business. Obviously, they're not. In fact, the competition is fierce over > something that you claim makes no sense. > > The fact of the matter is, running at a higher frame rate makes things > look smoother. Period, end of statement. If you take a time-based > animation inside a 30fps movie and a 60 fps movie, the 60 fps version will > look a lot smoother. It's not an opinion, it's a fact. > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
