Right the key point is maintain the AS3/Flex development platform and export to JS. Nobody will change backwards to program JS if you taste AS3 ;)
2011/12/19 ganaraj p r <ganara...@gmail.com> > ** > > > The general consensus is that > > a. People hate Flash. ( dont really know why!!! after reading all the HTML > 5 vs Flash articles... ) / Developers hate javascript ( atleast the people > who like the OOP paradigm! ). > b. Developers love AS3. ( Its the next best thing to chocolate! ) / People > love nice UI. > > The holy grail is to create something that "doesnt require flash" but can > be "programmed with as3" or something similiar and runs on a browser > "without any plugin". > > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Rogerio Gonzalez < > rogerio.gonza...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ** >> >> >> Hello to you all! >> >> Removing Flash Player from the picture, require use a client side >> technology available in most devices. >> >> HTML5 will require, at least, javascript. Since 99 I never really trust >> javascript because the cross-browser compatibility. >> Anyone care to illustrate to me what change since then? >> Do browsers in other devices really stick with "one version" of >> javascript? >> If between browsers, under windows, we don´t got a javascript running >> without a hole bunch of workarounds, what is the difference for others >> devices? >> >> You don´t wanna flash? I can understand that. But you will need something >> real to get the juice. You will need RIA. >> >> JavaFX can be an option. Silverlight already is, once the win8 got to >> devices. But none of then will work on iOS. Probably only silverlight will >> work on win8/metro ( 'will not run plugins... a side the ones from >> microsoft' ). >> >> I will stick with flash/flex for the time being and still waiting on the >> "next best thing" involving RIA and Web. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rogério Gonzalez >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:47 AM, ganaraj p r <ganara...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> ** >>> >>> >>> Hmmm. I doubt that would be possible. >>> >>> The problem has never been with compiling the code as such. Its about >>> how the compiled code is finally "used". Since we are going to be replacing >>> / removing the Flash Player from the picture, whether we compile the code >>> on the server end or compile the code on the client end it really doesnt >>> matter. >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Rick Winscot <rick.wins...@zyche.com>wrote: >>> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> >>>> Hmm… if Falcon is 10x faster than the previous compiler – could you >>>> incrementally feed it and have it emit to the browser? Kind of like a >>>> progressive download? >>>> >>>> >>>> From: ganaraj p r <ganara...@gmail.com> >>>> Reply-To: "flexcoders@yahoogroups.com" <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> >>>> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:17:54 +0000 >>>> To: "flexcoders@yahoogroups.com" <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> >>>> >>>> Subject: Re: [flexcoders] You are the product >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> All that adobe needs to do is, start attempting to replace the current >>>> JS with AS3. >>>> Currently AS3 is a compiled language and JS is an interpreted language. >>>> Now can adobe come up with an interpreter for as3? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Peter Ginneberge < >>>> p.ginnebe...@telenet.be> wrote: >>>> >>>>> ** >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > I really don't want to take a step back when I was >>>>> > in fact hoping to be getting a new version of >>>>> > action script that moved the main language even >>>>> > further forward. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> I feel the same way. I just dislike JS and going from ActionScript to >>>>> JavaScript is a step back.. a big one. >>>>> If you know Java, you're in luck 'cos with GWT you can just write Java >>>>> apps and they get compiled to JS (with html/css) and you >>>>> still get to use Maven/Spring/Hibernate and do all the OOP stuff and >>>>> whatnot. You don't have to look at javascript at all, let alone >>>>> write a single line of it ! >>>>> As I mentioned earlier, if FlashBuilder would do something similar, >>>>> I'd be all over it. >>>>> And it can be done, haXe already does that. >>>>> http://haxe.org/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Glenn Williams" <gl...@tinylion.co.uk> >>>>> To: <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2011 6:45 PM >>>>> Subject: RE: [flexcoders] You are the product >>>>> >>>>> > The samples are ok, but it's the actual langue I >>>>> > dislike. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > I just doesn't feel very complete to me. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > I really don't want to take a step back when I was >>>>> > in fact hoping to be getting a new version of >>>>> > action script that moved the main language even >>>>> > further forward. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > The whole situation just feels like a regression >>>>> > to me. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com >>>>> > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of >>>>> > Rick Winscot >>>>> > Sent: 18 December 2011 01:29 >>>>> > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com >>>>> > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] You are the product >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > The charts? The dashboard? The app as a whole? >>>>> > Yes. I'd recommend looking into the ExtJS samples >>>>> > at Sencha. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > http://www.sencha.com/products/extjs/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Ganaraj P R >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Ganaraj P R >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Ganaraj P R > > > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com> Avd. del General Perón, 32 Planta 10, Puertas P-Q 28020 Madrid
