Hmmm. I doubt that would be possible. The problem has never been with compiling the code as such. Its about how the compiled code is finally "used". Since we are going to be replacing / removing the Flash Player from the picture, whether we compile the code on the server end or compile the code on the client end it really doesnt matter.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Rick Winscot <rick.wins...@zyche.com>wrote: > ** > > > Hmm… if Falcon is 10x faster than the previous compiler – could you > incrementally feed it and have it emit to the browser? Kind of like a > progressive download? > > > From: ganaraj p r <ganara...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: "flexcoders@yahoogroups.com" <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:17:54 +0000 > To: "flexcoders@yahoogroups.com" <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] You are the product > > > > All that adobe needs to do is, start attempting to replace the current JS > with AS3. > Currently AS3 is a compiled language and JS is an interpreted language. > Now can adobe come up with an interpreter for as3? > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Peter Ginneberge <p.ginnebe...@telenet.be > > wrote: > >> ** >> >> >> > I really don't want to take a step back when I was >> > in fact hoping to be getting a new version of >> > action script that moved the main language even >> > further forward. >> > >> >> I feel the same way. I just dislike JS and going from ActionScript to >> JavaScript is a step back.. a big one. >> If you know Java, you're in luck 'cos with GWT you can just write Java >> apps and they get compiled to JS (with html/css) and you >> still get to use Maven/Spring/Hibernate and do all the OOP stuff and >> whatnot. You don't have to look at javascript at all, let alone >> write a single line of it ! >> As I mentioned earlier, if FlashBuilder would do something similar, I'd >> be all over it. >> And it can be done, haXe already does that. >> http://haxe.org/ >> >> >> regards, >> Peter >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Glenn Williams" <gl...@tinylion.co.uk> >> To: <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> >> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2011 6:45 PM >> Subject: RE: [flexcoders] You are the product >> >> > The samples are ok, but it's the actual langue I >> > dislike. >> > >> > >> > >> > I just doesn't feel very complete to me. >> > >> > >> > >> > I really don't want to take a step back when I was >> > in fact hoping to be getting a new version of >> > action script that moved the main language even >> > further forward. >> > >> > >> > >> > The whole situation just feels like a regression >> > to me. >> > >> > >> > >> > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com >> > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of >> > Rick Winscot >> > Sent: 18 December 2011 01:29 >> > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com >> > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] You are the product >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > The charts? The dashboard? The app as a whole? >> > Yes. I'd recommend looking into the ExtJS samples >> > at Sencha. >> > >> > >> > >> > http://www.sencha.com/products/extjs/ >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Ganaraj P R > > > -- Regards, Ganaraj P R
