Yes, I did try java -Xmx without any luck.
And I don't compile it in debug mode.

Maybe I should test it also with Ant to see the difference.

On 10/15/07, Adam Duston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   I use Flex Ant Tasks, and I haven't tried Maven for compiling Flex. But
> just a couple of thoughts: have you tried altering the max heap size using
> the java -Xmx option? I also wonder if the twice-the-size problem is a
> result of it compiling in debug mode.
>
>
> On 10/14/07, Ronen Naor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   Hi,
> > Has anyone encountered the following problem using the maven israfil
> > plugin:
> >
> > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
> >   at java.util.HashMap.resize(Unknown Source)
> >  at java.util.HashMap.addEntry(Unknown Source)
> >  at java.util.HashMap.put(Unknown Source)
> >  at macromedia.abc.ByteArrayPool.store(BytecodeBuffer.java:381)
> >  at macromedia.abc.IndexHistory.decodeOnDemand(ConstantPool.java:823)
> >  at macromedia.abc.IndexHistory.getIndex(ConstantPool.java:553)
> >  at macromedia.abc.IndexHistory.decodeOnDemand(ConstantPool.java:785)
> >  at macromedia.abc.IndexHistory.getIndex(ConstantPool.java :553)
> >  at macromedia.abc.Encoder.OP_callproperty(Encoder.java:2029)
> >  at macromedia.abc.Decoder$Opcodes.decode (Decoder.java:1389)
> >  at macromedia.abc.Decoder$MethodBodies.decode(Decoder.java:523)
> >  at flex2.tools.PostLink.merge(PostLink.java:325)
> >  at flex2.tools.PostLink.run(PostLink.java:72)
> >  at flex2.linker.API.link(API.java:42)
> >  at flex2.tools.Compiler.main(Compiler.java:226)
> >  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >  at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >  at net.israfil.mojo.flex2.StreamedParameterExecutableWrapper.main(
> > StreamedParameterExecutableWrapper.java:62)
> >
> > Also the created swf is twice the size of the swf created by Flex
> > Builder.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ronen.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  
>

Reply via email to