Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Subsystem run-levels

[James Turner]

On 18 Apr 2006, at 10:31, Melchior FRANZ wrote: Umm ... but what if it wants to wait for more than one subsystem. While possible, that would quickly become disgusting. Better real Nasal dependency resolution then.  :-| I think adding more groups and keying off them is much easier - I don't have any experience of messing with the C++ side of Nasal yet. Of course, SGSubsystemGroup is /also/ a SGSubsystem, so there's no real problem if you want to add support for real dependencies - depending on a group is just the same as depending on a single subsystem! H&H James