On mer 5 septembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * gh.robin -- 9/5/2007 6:37 PM: > > * On mer 5 septembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > > But it's information that needs to be available per gear, > > > [...] it has to be added to the JSBSim/fgfs interface. > > > > to me, It is not necessary to include it within JSBSim > > But that's IMHO the only way that makes sense. And JSBSim > (unlike YASim) currently lacks other gear features, anyway. > Per-gear-material-info can easily be implemented when the > JSBSim gear gets friction/solidity/etc. awareness. The > "the whole world is a runway" behavior is fun, but ... :-} > > In the meantime the Nasal solution is good enough. IMNSHO. > > m. > The power and flexibility within JSBsim gives facilities to include extra feature without any update/modification of the existing sources (in spite of a lack with carrier funct which will be solved). Any modifications within jsbsim / gears with material type related would be redundant. with existing features. i see only one improvement which could be done => to be able to process separately each gear components (left gear , right , rear gear ....)
We can with an external property "scenery material type" to process correctly the aircraft reactions according to the material type. Yes without any Property (which would be the best way) the Nasal solution is better than nothing Regards -- Gérard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
