--- Bil Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Now, I have to figure out why my frame rame sucks > >> so badly... > > > > > > Or just buy a widow pc optimized to run FlightGear > > ... :-) > > For an unexplained reason, it's working better now. > Athlon 3700+ 1 Gig hz 1 Gig memory, with onboard > ATI > Radeon XPress 200 video, yields about 9 frames per > sec > with the C-172. Yeah, I probably should get a better > video card in there (It's only money, right?). What > kind of rate should I be targeting? > > Also, is there a way to tell FG not to load all the > visual terrain data on the computer that is just > displaying instruments? Yeah, I should probably > RTFM!!! > > Thanks, > Bill
...and once I report 9 fps, I realize I was wrong. I'm running 26 fps on a single-computer configuration. I guess the 9 fps I was thinking of was on one of the other machines, 1.4 Gig, 16 MB ATI Rage card. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
