No Problem,
The version column as a timestamp you can use the Timestamp function of
nhibernate, to do so set the GetVersionColumnName convention to your
timestamp columnname and it should automagically pick that up to. I dont
think you need a custom user type in this situation.

Good Luck

Andy

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Luis Abreu <lab...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Thanks Andrew!
>
>
>
> Btw, one more question: Is there any way to specify the same definition for
> all my version columns? (ex.: all my version columns have the same name and
> I have a custom user type that should be used because on the db the version
> column is of type timestamp)
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---
>
> Luis Abreu
>
>
>
> *From:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andrew Stewart
> *Sent:* quinta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 2009 14:00
> *To:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [fluent-nhib] Re: question on auto mapping
>
>
>
> Hi Luis
>
>
>
> you need to inform automapper that your base type is EntidadeBase rather
> than object, something similar
>
> to below should do the job.
>
>
>
>          var autoMapper = AutoPersistenceModel
>
>                     .MapEntitiesFromAssemblyOf<ExampleClass>()
>
>                     .Where(t => t.Namespace ==
> "FluentNHibernate.AutoMap.TestFixtures.SuperTypes")
>
>                     .WithConvention(c =>
>
>                                         {
>
>                                             c.IsBaseType = b => b ==
> typeof(EntidadeBase);
>
>                                         });
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Luis Abreu <lab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hello guys.
>
> I've got a stupid question regarding the auto mapping functionality. I have
> the following:
>
>  private static PersistenceModel ObtemAutoConfiguracao()
>        {
>            return
> AutoPersistenceModel.MapEntitiesFromAssemblyOf<Disciplina>()
>                .Where(
>                            type => type == typeof(Disciplina)
>                ) //comecar com disciplina
>                .WithConvention(convention =>
>                                    {
>                                        convention.DefaultLazyLoad = false;
>                                        convention.FindIdentity = field =>
> field.Name == "Id";
>                                        convention.GetTableName = type =>
> String.Concat(type.Name, "s");
>                                        convention.GetVersionColumnName =
> type => "Versao";
>                                        convention.GetPrimaryKeyNameFromType
> = type => String.Concat("Id", type.Name);
>                                    });
>        }
>
> Now, I'm just trying to run a simple test to check the mapping of a single
> class (Disciplina). I was under the impression that the lambda I've passed
> to the where method should be more than enough for testing only the
> Disciplina class. My problem is that Disciplina inherits from EntidadeBase
> (which defined the Id and Version properties shared by all the entities)
> and
> the autopersistence model insists in generating an insert into
> EntidadeBases
> table when I use the Persistence Specification to test the mappings.
>
> Can anyone tell me why this happens and how to solve this? Can't I use
> inheritance in my classes and auto mapping? Thanks.
>
>
> ---
> Luis Abreu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> =================
> I-nnovate Software - Bespoke Software Development, uk wirral.
> http://www.i-nnovate.net
>
>
> >
>


-- 
=================
I-nnovate Software - Bespoke Software Development, uk wirral.
http://www.i-nnovate.net

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to