Hi Nancy, I do not believe this is an FOP bug. Could you tell us what version of FOP you are using?
As well try to run then .fo I have included at the end of this message. It uses proportional-column-width and I have no problems with FOP 0.93. Let us know if it works. Patrick nancy_b wrote: > Hi all, > > Well, I tried a workaround that Bob Stayton suggests: specifying a > proportional column width for all of my tables. Then I compiled and guess > what: the same annoying message is present: WARNING: table-layout="fixed" > and column-width unspecified => falling back to proportional-column-width(1) > > Is this a FOP bug? <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";> <fo:layout-master-set> <fo:simple-page-master master-name="A4"> <fo:region-body /> </fo:simple-page-master> </fo:layout-master-set> <fo:page-sequence master-reference="A4"> <fo:flow flow-name="xsl-region-body"> <fo:table table-layout="fixed" width="100mm"> <fo:table-column column-width="proportional-column-width(1)"/> <fo:table-column column-width="proportional-column-width(1)"/> <fo:table-header> <fo:table-row> <fo:table-cell> <fo:block font-weight="bold">Country</fo:block> </fo:table-cell> <fo:table-cell> <fo:block font-weight="bold">Capital</fo:block> </fo:table-cell> </fo:table-row> </fo:table-header> <fo:table-body> <fo:table-row> <fo:table-cell> <fo:block>Canada</fo:block> </fo:table-cell> <fo:table-cell> <fo:block>Ottawa</fo:block> </fo:table-cell> </fo:table-row> <fo:table-row> <fo:table-cell> <fo:block>France</fo:block> </fo:table-cell> <fo:table-cell> <fo:block>Paris</fo:block> </fo:table-cell> </fo:table-row> </fo:table-body> </fo:table> </fo:flow> </fo:page-sequence> </fo:root> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
