An example from Bob's book: <table><title>My table</title> <tgroup cols="4" > <colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="1*"/> <colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="2*"/> <colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="1.5*"/> <colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="1*"/> <thead>
Regards, Nancy Patrick Paul wrote: > > Patrick Paul wrote: >> Hi Nancy, >> >> I do not believe this is an FOP bug. Could you tell us what version of >> FOP you are using? >> > Ok I just read in another thread that you use FOP 0.93 so you really > shouldn't have this error message if your FO is right. >> As well try to run then .fo I have included at the end of this message. >> It uses proportional-column-width and I have no problems with FOP 0.93. >> >> Let us know if it works. >> >> Patrick >> >> nancy_b wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Well, I tried a workaround that Bob Stayton suggests: specifying a >>> proportional column width for all of my tables. Then I compiled and >>> guess >>> what: the same annoying message is present: WARNING: >>> table-layout="fixed" >>> and column-width unspecified => falling back to >>> proportional-column-width(1) >>> >>> Is this a FOP bug? >>> > Patrick > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/specifying-column-width-for-tables-tf4140979.html#a11784935 Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
