On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 07:15 -0400, Emily Gonyer wrote: > Of course people should be able to be paid to work on free software. > That's great. But when one or two large companies pay the majority of > developers, it becomes hard to argue that it is still a 'community > led' project, let alone one which is independent. And that's where > GNOME is right now.
Are we (those paid contributors) not part of the community? Are non-paid volunteers the only ones that can be part of the "community"? I don't understand your answer here. > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 21 May 2014 10:14, Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> wrote: > >> Suggesting that we don't have GNOME's best interests at heart is > >> just hurtful, and incorrect. > > > > Agreed. I've never once been told by anyone at Red Hat to do something > > that I didn't think was in the best interests of GNOME as a project. > > > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list