On Jun 7, 2005, at 6:28 PM, Duo wrote:
David Kelly wrote:
No, that is NOT Apple's plan. Apple's plan is to use Intel CPUs.
It has
nothing to do with "make the mac x86 compliant" or to use
commodity PC
hardware.
Uhm, for the last several years, they have been using alot more
"commodity" hardware, from AGP Video cards, etc. I cannot speak to x86
compliance, but, using commodity hardware, they most certainly have
been
doing. What do you call PCI/VGA? How about USB? USB wasnt even
considered a commodity until it was slapped into an iMac.
Think possibly I didn't speak clearly enough. Apple is not *adding*
commodity-ness to their product line. Thinking about it I'd bet part
of the deal with Intel is a special crypto block or similar in the
CPU uniquely identifying it as an Apple Blessed CPU. Apple does this
very thing with disk drives. Originally Apple SCSI drivers would only
format and configure Apple-blessed drives. Currently the same thing
holds true for internal CD/DVD drives. But put the same non-Apple
drive on Firewire and MacOS is happy with it.
The only AGP/PCI video cards I know of which work in a Mac are the
Apple-branded ATI's, but can't say I've been shopping lately. Once
Upon A Time I totally failed to convert a Matrox Millennium to Mac
service, even with Matrox software. Adaptec PCI SCSI cards certainly
can not be made to work in a Macintosh without major work, one has to
purchase the specific Macintosh version. PCI ethernet cards often
work on MacOS X due to those who "abandoned" BSD to work for Apple on
Darwin.
Mouse, keyboard, and most USB devices work right out of the box on
Macintosh.
It will be quite some time before one sees Apple software running on
commodity PC hardware.
As someone who cut his teeth with Apple hardware, this is a glaring
piece of misinformation. Sorry for the harsh tone, but, the days of
"mac
only" monitors, the Mac boot ROM, etc, have been long gone for
awhile now.
Mac-only monitor? One only has to look back a little bit for the "17
inch Apple Studio LCD". Has an Apple-only digital video interface.
Is damn cool. One cable has everything including power, USB, and a
couple of control switches which are apparently light sensors. Only
one plug at the end of the cable. Does a lot for cleaning up cable
clutter.
As for Apple's insistance they "wont allow" OS X to be run on anything
other than sanctioned Mac hardware, id like to point to similar
statements from the MPAA regarding DVD, etc. I give it two weeks from
the retail release of OS X for intel, before we see a slashdot entry.
There are already those running PowerPC MacOS X on x86 hardware using
CPU interpreter/emulation.
One thing, that I am insanely curious about, is, will this make endian
issues in sourcecode not ported to PPC go away for the most part?
Specifically in regard to networking (client/server)?
Is there a way to toggle a modern Intel CPU into big-endian mode?
Thats part of the big fuss with the G5 and VirtualPC, that unlike the
G4, the G5 can't be simply toggled back and forth between big and
little. Or maybe the G5 can't be toggled at all.
--
David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
========================================================================
Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
