On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Matthew Reimer wrote: > > Great work guys! It almost seems that -current is more stable than > > -stable! > > > > Matt > > Funny you should mention it. I've heard this from a number of people over > the last week.. One has even suggested using a particular known-good 4.0 > snapshot in preference to a 3.1-stable for a production system...... > > Cheers, > -Peter And on this note -- is it planned to merge or backport these patches to -stable? We make very heavy use of NFS (udp, 100mb fxp0 fullduplex). We're using FreeBSD-3.1-STABLE as NFS clients to a big Auspex NS7000 NFS file server. We're in production mode in our lab and can't risk running -current on many of our machines so we've decided to run -stable on ALL of them (except perhaps MY machine but don't tell anyone ;-) Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
