"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
>
> > Funny you should mention it. I've heard this from a number of people over
> > the last week.. One has even suggested using a particular known-good 4.0
> > snapshot in preference to a 3.1-stable for a production system......
>
> That's a little foolish since we've still not found all the egcs
> optimizer bugs and whatnot; didn't you guys see the one Luigi found
> the other day for ftpd? Now *that* had to be some obscure debugging
> work! :-)
Clearly, that goes to show Luigi must have no life... :-)
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
d...@newsguy.com
d...@freebsd.org
"Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
