> Matthew Reimer wrote:
> > Great work guys! It almost seems that -current is more stable than
> > -stable!
> > Matt
> 
> Funny you should mention it.  I've heard this from a number of people over
> the last week..  One has even suggested using a particular known-good 4.0
> snapshot in preference to a 3.1-stable for a production system......
> 
> Cheers,
> -Peter


Are there any particularly good snapshots one should try?  I have a couple
of spare boxes on the home net that I am willing to try or crash, for the
fun of it.  I was using the snap from about 3 weeks back on my home web
server and it seems rock solid, but I am running rather plain hardware.

Bob Keys



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to