> I wonder if it would be too radical to suggest that the release cycle for > 4.0 be *much* shorter than the 3.0 cycle. Maintaining two branches gets > worse and worse as time goes on and it just becomes a waste of programmer > time. If we are reasonably careful with the 4.0 tree, I think a 4.0
What's your definition of "much" in this case? I also disagree that the multi-branch model is a "waste" of programmer time since it's what keeps us able to have an experimental line of development at all. To programmers, that's pretty important. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
