On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:48:35 +1030 "Michael T. Pope" <mp...@computer.org> wrote: > Now that 0.11.3 is out I am looking through the list of issues I had put > aside. One of them is the question of whether dialogs/panels/whatever > should be resizable or not. What do people think? What we have ATM is > not consistent, and does not seem to be guided by any underlying > principles. Any suggestions for what these should be?
This discussion got buried without resolution. However after re-reading the thread it is clear that there is more support for making dialogs resizeable than for fixed sizes, if only to allow the user to work around strange window sizes, scales and bugs. Therefore unless a strong counter-argument appears, I think we should start transitioning to resizeable dialog/panels. To that end, now that EuropePanel is resizeable, can we have some comment from wintertime about how that was done, and/or some general remarks about good practice for enabling resizeability? And yes, with the principle decided, I think we can now close BR#459 as "wont fix". Cheers, Mike Pope
pgptAA3M_3EPL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
