On ke, 09 joulu 2020, Charles Hedrick wrote:
thanks. There’s enough jargon in this that I’m not sure I understand. What’s the difference in level of QA between freeipa in Stream and RHEL? I’d be happy to have new versions of IPA sooner, if they’ve actually been tested well enough that they’re ready for the next RHEL release. Are things in good enough shape that it would make sense to convert to stream now?
Difference in QA: I hope there will be very little difference. After all, C8S (hopefully) will be an automated build of what is accepted into RHEL 8.x build, after that one passed through QA. If any bug is found in RHEL 8.x build that would require a rebuild, it means as soon as the new build gets into RHEL 8.x compose, it is built for C8S. All the above is my understanding of what is essentially still being created -- as announcement said yesterday, C8S will be in full use by end of 2021.
Do you think the in-place upgrade of Centos to RHEL would be safe to do with freeipa? I’d assume there’s no actual difference in the packages.
CentOS to RHEL should be straight-forward. The only difference in ipa package in CentOS is (de)-branding. I admit, I have no tests of the reinstall for that. If ipa-server-upgrade ran during package reinstall would find something weird, this could be a bug to report and fix. -- / Alexander Bokovoy Sr. Principal Software Engineer Security / Identity Management Engineering Red Hat Limited, Finland _______________________________________________ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
