Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Everybody argue about something and usually its so difficult to come to > a conclusion. Microsoft says windows is good, linux people say linux is > better, I say FreeBSD is best :)
NetBSD... > Microsoft always says the newer version of windows works faster and more > efficiently etc. But yet they require faster cpu's and more memory in > their system requirements :) When we leave the memory out, I wonder why > a more efficient system require faster cpu :) there is a problem in this > equation :) At work, we run CPU and memory intensive applications. On the same hardward, the relative speed of our apps on the various OS's, relative to NetBSD, are: NetBSD: 1.0 Linux : 0.6 XP : 0.2 NT4 : >0.1 So I agree, XP is twice as good as NT4. :) Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
