My testing confirms Alan's numbers, however he neglected to mention:
Solaris: 2.5 VMS on Alpha: 8.0 :)
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:07:58 -0400 "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Everybody argue about something and usually its so difficult to come to a conclusion. Microsoft says windows is good, linux people say linux is better, I say FreeBSD is best :)
NetBSD...
Microsoft always says the newer version of windows works faster and more efficiently etc. But yet they require faster cpu's and more memory in their system requirements :) When we leave the memory out, I wonder why a more efficient system require faster cpu :) there is a problem in this
equation :)
At work, we run CPU and memory intensive applications. On the same
hardward, the relative speed of our apps on the various OS's, relative
to NetBSD, are:
NetBSD: 1.0 Linux : 0.6 XP : 0.2 NT4 : >0.1
So I agree, XP is twice as good as NT4. :)
Alan DeKok.
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
