Thanks, Aura. What exact version of FreeSurfer are you using? I’m assuming it’s a development version, but from when? The results are indeed weird…
-- Juan Eugenio Iglesias ERC Senior Research Fellow Translational Imaging Group University College London http://www.jeiglesias.com http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/ From: <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of "Hurtado, Aura Maria" <ahurt...@mgh.harvard.edu> Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Date: Friday, 23 March 2018 at 05:28 To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Module, output error Hi Eugenio, Thank you for replying so quickly to my lengthy message. I correct some of my statements, 1. Matlab 8.4 was used (not 8.2) 2. When I ran the cross-sectional subfield command, I did not get exit errors as I did with the longitudinal command (kvlGetOptimizer). I got output errors and warnings of non convergence in the log file. -I see your point. I mean the built-in hippocampal module (v10) worked when reconall was run with fs60 (hippoSf). When run independently, the hippocampal module (v21) exited with errors when using segmentHA_T1_long.sh, and the output was off when using segmentHA_T1.sh (this is better seen in pic 3). I hope this clarifies a bit. Please tell me if it doesn’t. These are screenshots of the images output by jobs that exited without processing errors:
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
