External Email - Use Caution        

Dear Dr. Douglas,

Thank you so much!

Best regards,
Ting

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 11:45 AM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <
dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

> I've attached a couple of papers
>
> On 12/3/19 9:24 PM, Ting Li wrote:
> >
> >         External Email - Use Caution
> >
> > Dear Dr. Douglas,
> >
> > Thank you so much.
> >
> > I have difficulty to understand z map is essentially an infinite # of
> > subjects.
> > Before smooth, there is no GLM analysis. Does the smooth include in
> > the GLM process?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Ting
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:14 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
> > <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >     On 12/3/2019 1:36 PM, Ting Li wrote:
> >>
> >>             External Email - Use Caution
> >>
> >>     Dear Dr. Douglas,
> >>
> >>     Thank  you so much for all the answers. I have two more questions.
> >>
> >>     1, When the Monte Carlo simulation is doing, how does one
> >>     simulation is done?
> >>
> >>       * synthesize z map (synthesize z map for how many subjects?)
> >>
> >     The Z is essentailly an infinite # of subjects (it is just a
> >     single map).
> >>
> >>       * smooth z map (You have mentioned the FWHM comes from an
> >>         estimate from the residuals of the analysis, which analysis?
> >>         or the way we process the real data with the command
> >>         mris_preproc with FWHM value? )
> >>
> >     The GLM analysis, from the residual.
> >>
> >>       * threshold z map (Does it mean a GLM analysis so we can have
> >>         threshold z map?)
> >>
> >     No, the z-map is synthesized directly
> >
> >     The simulation is done in mri_glmfit-sim and in mri_mcsim.
> >
> >>     2, When we reference to the CSD files in freesurfer, will it
> >>     correct the cluster size p-value based on DOF (degree of
> >>     freedom), like the t-ratios table including a DOF? Thanks a lot!
> >     I don't know what you mean.
> >>
> >>     Best regards,
> >>     Ting
> >>
> >>     On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:59 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
> >>     <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
> >>
> >>         Correct. This is no different than, eg, a t-test. Look in
> >>         the back of a stats book from the 1950s and you will find a
> >>         table of t-ratios and corresponding p-values. Obviously, they
> >>         did not have access to any of the data being analyzed
> >>         today:), but the tables are still valid.
> >>
> >>         On 12/2/2019 2:03 PM, Ting Li wrote:
> >>>
> >>>                 External Email - Use Caution
> >>>
> >>>         Dear Dr. Douglas,
> >>>
> >>>         Thank you so much for your detailed response.
> >>>
> >>>         The simulation here is to get the probability of a maximum
> >>>         cluster that size or larger in the cached CSD files. It
> >>>         checks the probability of  the cluster size but have nothing
> >>>         to do with the analysis metrics that I have used. Do I
> >>>         understand correctly?
> >>>
> >>>         Best regards,
> >>>         Ting Li
> >>>
> >>>         On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:57 AM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
> >>>         <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>             On 12/2/2019 11:58 AM, Ting Li wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>                     External Email - Use Caution
> >>>>
> >>>>             Dear Dr. Douglas,
> >>>>
> >>>>             Thank you so much for your quick response! You saved my
> >>>>             half life.
> >>>>
> >>>>             From the introduction of clusterwise correction for
> >>>>             multiple comparisons, I have a few questions.
> >>>>
> >>>>             1, What is the null hypothesis here ?
> >>>             In the tutorial, the null hypothesis is that there is no
> >>>             effect of age (age slope = 0)
> >>>>             2, What is a z map? Do you mean synthesize cortical
> >>>>             datasets?
> >>>             A z-map is just a map where all the values are from a
> >>>             gaussian distribution with mean=0 and stddev=1. This
> >>>             just assigns a random z-value to each vertex on fsaverage
> >>>>             3. Smooth z map, what FWHM do you use, if it is not
> >>>>             consistent with my FWHM, how will it affect the results?
> >>>             The FWHM comes from an estimate from the residuals of
> >>>             the analysis. The residuals are everything that does not
> >>>             fit the linear model and represent noise. We use the
> >>>             residuals to estimate the underlying smoothness (FWHM),
> >>>>             4, Threshold z map, what does level mean? Does it mean
> >>>>             the vertex p-value?
> >>>             Basically, it is the vertex p-value, but we use  the
> >>>             "sig" = -log10(p). You also have to specify the sign. If
> >>>             you have an a priori hypothesis about the direction,
> >>>             then you can specify pos (positive) or neg (negative).
> >>>             If you do not have an a priori hypothesis, then use abs
> >>>             (for absolute, for an unsigned test).
> >>>>
> >>>>             ClusterwiseCorrection for Multiple Comparisons
> >>>>             To perform a cluster-wise correction for multiple
> >>>>             comparisons, we will run a simulation. The simulation
> >>>>             isa way to get a measure of the distribution of the
> >>>>             maximum cluster size under the _null __hypothesis_.
> >>>>             This isdone by iterating over the following steps:
> >>>>             1. Synthesize a z map
> >>>>             2. Smooth z map (using residual FWHM)
> >>>>             3. Threshold z map (level and sign)
> >>>>             4. Find clusters in thresholded map
> >>>>             5. Record area of maximum cluster
> >>>>             6. Repeat over desired number of iterations (usually >
> >>>>             5000)
> >>>>
> >>>>             Thank you so much!
> >>>>
> >>>>             Best regards,
> >>>>             Ting
> >>>>
> >>>>             On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 10:20 AM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
> >>>>             <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
> >>>>             <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>                 That will use the pre-computed ("cached") CSD files
> >>>>                 distributed with FreeSurfer. This used 10,000
> >>>>                 iterations.
> >>>>
> >>>>                 On 12/1/2019 11:34 PM, Ting Li wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                         External Email - Use Caution
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                 Dear Freesurfer Expert:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                 I have used the simulation code as show below:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                 mri_glmfit-sim \
> >>>>>                    --glmdir lh.gender_age.glmdir \
> >>>>>                    --cache 4 neg \
> >>>>>                    --cwp  0.05\
> >>>>>                    --2spaces
> >>>>>                 My question is how many iterations are done during
> >>>>>                 this simulation? I didn’t specify the iteration
> >>>>>                 number.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                 Why I didn’t have the csd file?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                 Thanks a lot for your response!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                 Best regards,
> >>>>>                 Ting
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                 _______________________________________________
> >>>>>                 Freesurfer mailing list
> >>>>>                 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu  <mailto:
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >>>>>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>>>
> >>>>                 _______________________________________________
> >>>>                 Freesurfer mailing list
> >>>>                 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >>>>                 <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >>>>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>             _______________________________________________
> >>>>             Freesurfer mailing list
> >>>>             Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu  <mailto:
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >>>>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>>
> >>>             _______________________________________________
> >>>             Freesurfer mailing list
> >>>             Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >>>             <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >>>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>         _______________________________________________
> >>>         Freesurfer mailing list
> >>>         Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu  <mailto:
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >>>         https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>
> >>         _______________________________________________
> >>         Freesurfer mailing list
> >>         Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >>         https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>
> >>
> >>     _______________________________________________
> >>     Freesurfer mailing list
> >>     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu  <mailto:
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >>     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Freesurfer mailing list
> >     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to