Hi Matthew,
Could you take a little time and try to get acquainted with cmake,
starting at http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/documentation.html ?
I doubt there's any reason you'd either have to fork or learn cmake at
more than a trivial level. It would be different if someone hadn't made
it build on multiple platforms already.
Thanks
Bruce
On 6/17/2013 4:40 PM, Matthew Pitts wrote:
Richard, David and Bruce,
I respect the choice made to cut over to cmake, but that doesn't mean
I like the idea of having to learn something new to be able to do the
projects I have in mind that will be using Codec2, especially when one
of those projects already uses Autotools and having that capability in
Codec2-dev will simplify the work for me. I really don't want to have
to fork Codec2 just to keep Autotools; the effort of keeping it in
sync with various developers changes would be almost as much of a
drain on my time as learning cmake on top of the two build systems I
already have to work with.
Matthew Pitts
N8OHU
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
