OK, go ahead.

    Thanks

    Bruce

On 7/24/2013 4:04 PM, Matthew Pitts wrote:
Of course, Bruce.

Matthew Pitts
N8OHU

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Bruce Perens <[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 24, 2013 5:06 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Freetel-codec2] codec2-dev different results with cmake vs. autotools

I think the understanding would have to be that you woud accept other developers breaking autotools in doing development, and that you would not break the cmake build.

Thanks

Bruce


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to