Of course, Bruce.
Matthew Pitts
N8OHU
________________________________
From: Bruce Perens <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] codec2-dev different results with cmake vs.
autotools
I think the understanding would have to be that you woud accept other
developers breaking autotools in doing development, and that you would not
break the cmake build.
Thanks
Bruce
Matthew <[email protected]> wrote:
Well, if David and Bruce don't have a problem with it, I would like to step up
and maintain them, even if I end up being the only person that uses them.
>
>Matthew Pitts
>N8OHU
>
>Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject:Re: [Freetel-codec2] codec2-dev different results with cmake vs.
>autotools
>From :Richard Shaw
>Date :Wed, 24-Jul-2013 12:08
>To :[email protected]
>CC :
>
>
>On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Matthew <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Richard,
>>
>>Autotools does pretty much everything that cmake does, even if it's not
>>obvious to a person that has never used it before. About the only thing that
>>I remember you talking about doing with it that Autotools doesn't do is
>>download and install missing libraries, but that part can be done with shell
>>scripts. Even building the code in a separate directory is possible with
>>Autotools.
>
>
>There was never a question as to the capability of autotools or cmake tools,
>but rather the FreeDV/codec2 implementation. Right now the freedv autotools
>configuration is broken for many or incomplete, whichever way you want to look
>at it. I don't know autotools well enough to fix it so I developed the cmake
>config since that's what I'm comfortable with.
>
>
>I know other projects try to maintain multiple build systems
>(autotools/scons/cmake, etc.) and personally I don't have a problem with that,
>but no one has stepped up fix the autotools build in it's current
>implementation or support it on a continuing basis. That being the case if I
>were leading the project, which I'm not, I would make the same decision Bruce
>did.
>
>
>Thanks,
>Richard
>
>________________________________
>
>See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
>Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
>Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
>Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
>http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
>________________________________
>
>Freetel-codec2 mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
