I think that we can all accept that both programs are Turing-complete. But
that's not really the point. We are moving on from autotools, and if you want
to continue use it you are going to have to be self-supporting.
I am doing a coding pass over FreeDV and perhaps a little of Codec2 in
preparation for the 1.0 release. I will be using cmake and won't be trying to
break autotools, but nor will I test that any of my changes work with it.
Thanks
Bruce
Matthew <[email protected]> wrote:
>Richard,
>
>Autotools does pretty much everything that cmake does, even if it's not
>obvious to a person that has never used it before. About the only thing
>that I remember you talking about doing with it that Autotools doesn't
>do is download and install missing libraries, but that part can be done
>with shell scripts. Even building the code in a separate directory is
>possible with Autotools.
>
>Matthew Pitts
>N8OHU
>
>Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject:Re: [Freetel-codec2] codec2-dev different results with cmake
>vs. autotools
>From :Richard Shaw
>Date :Mon, 22-Jul-2013 14:19
>To :[email protected]
>CC :
>
>On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Matthew <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Bruce,
>
>Fine; I've installed it on my CentOS box, but that doesn't mean I like
>it. It still doesn't make sense to take away options, even if they
>aren't being maintained like someone would want.
>
>
>Perhaps there's been some conversation I haven't been privy to, but
>what does the cmake build have to do with CentOS? The whole point of
>the cmake build is it should work for almost any system
>(linux/windows/OSX/BSD)
>
>
>I'm often overly diplomatic most of the time which hasn't seemed to
>help so I'll be more direct...
>
>
>I don't see how changing to cmake effectively "takes options away",
>other than in the very technical interpretation that yes, the autotools
>build will eventually go away. The cmake build lets you have more
>control over the build, how it get's built, and even how it gets
>installed. How does that provide less options?
>
>
>You want it to do something that it doesn't do yet? Ask! If I can
>figure out how to make it happen I'll do it.
>
>
>You've made it abundantly clear that you don't want to learn cmake but
>provided very little data as to why. Have you looked at the code? Have
>you tried it? (As a parent Green Eggs and Ham is coming to mind).
>
>
>Richard
>
>KF5OIM
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
>Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
>Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
>Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
>http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Freetel-codec2 mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
