glen e. p. ropella wrote: > The rest of us admit that implicit and undeclarable knowledge is part of > the codec for any abstracted law. > Do you mean undeclarable in the sense of 1) It's unreasonable to expect a one-time formal, and complete declaration from anyone, or 2) the knowledge can't be communicated or inferred or modeled, in principle. The ethic of `more is better' is what I'm pushing, and yes, toward machine readability (e.g. semantic web) and automatons.
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org