LORDY! You folks do go on and on.
A humble request: *Could one of you, sort of, ...you know: Get To The Point?* I mean really. For *days* we've been inundated with vague postulations about math, music, ABMs, biomimicry (whatever that is) complexity (whatever *that* is) compression, fidelity of resolution, mental disorders (don't ask my opinion on this one), mentalism and calculus (cringe), etc. etc. etc. But, What is the point of this particular thread of expostulation? Because if it is "Complexity is", or some such, could somebody just please just say it? Thank you very much. -- Doug Roberts, RTI International [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 505-455-7333 - Office 505-670-8195 - Cell On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Marcus G. Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > glen e. p. ropella wrote: > >> Btw, no, I don't mean [science can be pursued by a specified > >> automaton]. I mean a growing, developing automaton. Evolving on its > >> own accord as well as with editing by human experts. Much more useful > >> than a textbook! > >> > > > > The only problem with this belief is the vague > > concept of "growing" or "progress". > Growing in the sense of adding more and more ontologies for different > kinds of experiments. Growing in the toolbox sense of R or Mathematica > growing. Growing in the sense of machine-readable > semantically-annotated data stores growing. > So one might imagine internet publication of statistical regularities > from automaton-initiated data mining, and then researchers (or even > robots) testing them in the lab... > > Marcus > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org >
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
