I believe Qualia can be encoded. How? If we take a look at Olympic sport events 
we can distinguish between sports where we can measure physical results 
objectively, like athletics or swimming where we can measure time, weight, 
height or distance, and sports where we judge beauty and aesthetics 
subjectively, like diving or gymnastics where we measure the results by a jury 
rating.https://www.reuters.com/graphics/OLYMPICS-2024/EXPLAINER/byprqrwmqve/explainers/Objective
 experience means something can be measured by an instrument, while subjective 
experience needs a judge or jury. What we need is therefore some kind of jury 
in the "society of mind" (to use Marvin Minsky's metaphor) which is able to 
rate events. During the course of life we have acquired - guided by our 
emotions - different tastes and preferences of likes and dislikes, as if each 
of us has assembled a different jury which decides if the perception is good or 
bad based on the compressed subjective knowledge gained in past events. 
Ultimately the emotions decide what is good or bad if no previous knowledge 
exists.The subjective experience of what-x-feels like boils down to what causes 
pleasure and pain, the control mechanisms our genes have created to ensure the 
well-being of the body. Obviously we do more of the things that feel good and 
avoid things that feel hurt. Eventually our subjective experience is formed in 
Nick's words by the slice of the world we have experienced. Thus the jury 
menbers can be seen as witnesses of past events that felt good or bad. The 
composition of the jury is path-dependent: Qualia can be encoded as 
preferential attachment of jury members for the society of mind. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferential_attachment-J.
-------- Original message --------From: Russ Abbott <russ.abb...@gmail.com> 
Date: 7/27/24  12:36 AM  (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity 
Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Writing and Civilization 
and AI, oh my! From a consciousness perspective, what (so-far) cannot be 
encoded digitally by a robot are qualia. A robot can encode light frequencies, 
but not, for example, what red looks like. I can't think of a way to put 
what-red-looks-like into words. From a subjective experience perspective, it 
seems like a sort of primitive. How would you do it? What words would you use 
to express what red looks like?  -- Russ Abbott                                 
      Professor Emeritus, Computer ScienceCalifornia State University, Los 
AngelesOn Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 12:13 PM Marcus Daniels <mar...@snoutfarm.com> 
wrote:Which of this cannot be encoded digitally by a robot?

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2024 12:12 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Writing and Civilization and AI, oh my!

I agree with one small caveat. Artifacts; tangible, written, stigmergic, ... 
are but a small part of what is "cooperatively constructed and kneaded." The 
vast majority of what an individual "knows" and the vast majority of what the 
'collective' "knows" is tacit, 'in-the-mind' and transmitted orally and/or by 
non-formal means.

davew


On Fri, Jul 26, 2024, at 12:18 PM, glen wrote:
> Similarly, but a bit larger in scope, humans (and other animals) are 
> merely small parts of a larger system. The extent to which any one 
> person actually knows anything (much less is wise about anything) is 
> negligible, on the same order as that which a chimpanzee knows or is 
> wise about something. What's *valuable*, worth preserving, are the 
> cooperatively constructed and kneaded stigmergic cultural artifacts.
>
> But unlike Plato's straw man, suggesting the artifacts are somehow 
> fixed and repetitive, what's interesting about them is a) their 
> re-interpretation through successive generations and b) the 
> derivations spawned from them. Decay and derivation are more 
> informative than preservation. No single artifact (including flora and 
> fauna, knowledge or wisdom) matters. What matters is the milieu, 
> co-mediated by artifacts like math and painting.
>
> On 7/26/24 09:14, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>> *< *Particularly galling to me is the deprecation and dismissal of 
>> any human knowledge, wisdom, experience ... that cannot be reduced to 
>> mere words and abstract symbols. The epitome of this is the conceit 
>> that AI—which is nothing more than the algorithmic manipulation of 
>> abstract meaningless tokens is somehow "equivalent" to human 
>> intelligence.>
>> 
>> The conceit of humans, thinking their low energy, low frequency, lossy 
>> biochemical system can compete with tens of thousands of 80 
>> billion-transistor GPUs each running a billion operations a second.
>
>
> --
> ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to