Le Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:54:50 +0100, Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:21:37AM +0100, bouleetbil > <[email protected]> wrote: > > For me, base can't be bumped directly into current. > > For me, "ALL" packages from base should be bumped into a wip, and we should > > ask to mailing list this packages before merge it current as gnome, xorg... > > No objections on my side. James, is that acceptable for you? > > BTW as far as I see the only major update since rc1 was the udev one > which is already reverted, so I guess this time the problem is already > solved. > > Thanks for raising the issue, though. Hi I don't talk only about major update but "all" packages into base perhaps except pacman-g2(because it's develop by you, you know the sources and I suppose you test it before :D). systemd, kernel, udev... We can't say we know/read the sources of all base packages. And the only solution it's to test it before. All packages into base are sensitive and not only major update. For me we should bump/move packages into basetesting. With this method we can test it some days and don't break current. It's not very complicated and "all" devels if they want can report some problem before merge it. I've wait some week for merge xorgtesting because ATI blob is not ready(just an example). Devil can say this kernel break my wifi chipset etc... Sometimes I think we forgot that Frugalware is an Operating System. We play to lego (http://www.simpsonsweb.com/upload/lego_bart_milhouse.jpg ):) for build a good OS and only one package can break all the system quickly ! and break it for only one package is too bad. In french channel I having too much messages about current is broken. ok current is for bump some packages the devel version but current != broken :p you know what I think :D bouleetbil bye _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
