On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:33:52PM +0100, bouleetbil <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't talk only about major update but "all" packages into base perhaps > except pacman-g2(because it's develop by you, you know the sources and I > suppose you test it before :D). systemd, kernel, udev... We can't say we > know/read the sources of all base packages. And the only solution it's to > test it before. > All packages into base are sensitive and not only major update. For me we > should bump/move packages into basetesting.
I would not make pacman-g2 an exception, since sometimes an issue is not trivial to fix, see https://bugs.frugalware.org/ticket/4305 for example. > With this method we can test it some days and don't break current. It's not > very complicated and "all" devels if they want can report some problem before > merge it. I've wait some week for merge xorgtesting because ATI blob is not > ready(just an example). > Devil can say this kernel break my wifi chipset etc... Sometimes I think we > forgot that Frugalware is an Operating System. > We play to lego (http://www.simpsonsweb.com/upload/lego_bart_milhouse.jpg ):) > for build a good OS and only one package can break all the system quickly ! > and break it for only one package is too bad. > > In french channel I having too much messages about current is broken. ok > current is for bump some packages the devel version > but current != broken :p > > you know what I think :D Sure, I understand, that's why I did not object.
pgpX4lBZGF0LK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
