> "child porn" > That is a whole different can of worms and _that_ is the type of > stuff that should be acted on. There someone is being hurt.
Maybe. Didn't Australia recently determine that a cartoon of Bart Simpson was kiddie porn? Mind you, when real kids _are_ involved, I totally agree - string 'em out to dry. But the law is amazing in its capacity for disconnecting from reality; I've seen it said that in some jurisdictions, it's possible for *plain text* to constitute child porn. Even if no children were involved in its creation whatsoever. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
